154
press all such claims as well as extremely difficult to induce
is clear? the Chinese Government to accept them. It seems unlikely how-
ever that the latter
•Vanaware f the existence of
se earlier
olaism (please see the correspondence between the two seations
of the railway enclosed in Sir Cecil Clementi's despatch) and in
the event of any claim for mspension of traffie being presented
I see no logical alternative to formally recording the whole a-
mount of claims outstanding ander this head.
Otherwise the
Chinese may assume that, by presenting the 1929 claim alone and
enforcing it by with-holding the amount from the cash balance due
to the Chinese section of the Railway, we are attempting to man-
couvre them into acceptance of the principle underlying such
claims witli a view to subsequent recovery of the disproportionate-
ly larger amounts outstanding in respect of previous years.
7.
Finally it should not be overlooked (in connection with the
possibility of this claim becoming the subject of a controversy
between His a jesty's Government and the Chinese Government)
that the agreement in queation was never formally ratified on
the Chinese side.
I have the honour to
wita the highest respect, sir,
Your most obedient, humble servant,
(SIGNED) KILES LAMESON.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.